Lecture Notes.
 
  

 
Module Twelve: Session Seven

Hypotheses (Continued)

Five criteria for evaluating a hypothesis

Because confirmed hypotheses are inductive arguments, their adequacy requires careful consideration.

  • 1) Relevance
    The hypothesis must adequately explain something of significance in a way which matters. For instance suppose my hypothesis is that wicked spirits are making my car run rough. This does not help me solve the problem. It is irrelevant to the problem in that it doesn't get us any closer to solving it than before I developed the hypothesis.
  • 2) Testability
    There should be some way of falsifying the hypothesis. If there is no way to falsify it, then the hypothesis is not much good. The wicked spirit example above is such a case. You can't see wicked spirits, so you can't prove that they aren't causing the engine to run rough. The same is true of many highly regarded scientific hypotheses, like the theory of evolution. It cannot be disproved. These are known as non-falsifiable hypotheses.
  • 3) Compatibility with Previously Well-Established Hypotheses
    A hypothesis should comport with other hypotheses that are solidly confirmed. For instance, the hypothesis about wicked spirits in the engine does not line up well with hypotheses regarding mechanical devices and physics in general.
  • 4) Predictive or Explanatory Power
    A good hypothesis will accurately predict future events. For instance is I have a hypothesis about combining certain chemicals that says that it should cause yellow smoke, then it should actually produce yellow smoke each time it is done in the future.
  • 5) Simplicity
    When comparing several hypotheses which appear to be adequate in terms of the above four criteria, it is good to select the one that does this in the simplest manner. This is not to say that the best hypothesis is simple. It is to say that the hypothesis most likely to be correct is the one which is the least complicated. See Ockham's Razor in the next section.
    • Ockham's Razor
      • "Entities are not to be multiplied beyond necessity."

      • Trivia note: Though this is sound logical advice, it is unlikely that Ockham ever used these exact words. The following words, which communicate essentially the same idea are Ockham's:
      • "Plurality is not to be assumed without necessity" and "What can be done with fewer [assumptions] is done in vain with more.

Continue for more on hypotheses.

^ Top
 
<Back | Next>

 
Site Map | Last Updated on January 23, 2018 | ©2018 D. S. Peterson