Answer
to Task 2: Sorting the supporting arguments into topics
Arguments that support the author's main
conclusion
However, as Smith states, dolphins, whales and
seals can be be viewed in the wild at a number of
places on the Australian coast.
Moreover, dolphin and whale biology changes in
marine park conditions.
Furthermore, we should be promoting our
beautiful natural environment to tourists and not
the ugly concrete marine park venues.
Tourists come here to see our native wildlife in
its natural environment and not to see it in cages
and cement pools.
In addition, marine mammals in dolphin parks are
trained and this means that their patterns of
social behavior are changed.
In fact, there are more places where they can be
seen in the wild than places where they can be seen
in captivity.
In addition, places where there are wild marine
mammals do not charge an exorbitant entry fee -
they are free.
Surveys of overseas tourists show that they come
here for a variety of other reasons and not to
visit places like Seaworld (The Age, Good Weekend
16.8.93).
Therefore research undertaken at marine parks is
generally not reliable.
However, foreign tourists would still come to
Australia if the parks were closed down.
They can usually see animals in those conditions
in their own countries.
However, as Jones (1991) explains, park research
is only useful for understanding captive animals
and is not useful for learning about animals in the
wild.
Their diets are different, they have
significantly lower life spans and they are more
prone to disease.
Moreover, most Australians would have to travel
less to get to these locations than they would to
get to the marine parks on the Gold Coast.